In April 2019, Cow Chop announced a “GOING OUT OF Business SALE”, implying the channel would disband by the top of the year. In 2019, this was to paint facets of her conduct in a better light at a time when she did not want to pursue a complaint; but by 2021 and afterwards, most were part of a broader narrative or theme she and her boyfriend wished others to consider (and, it appears, others wished to imagine). She then did so to Ms Maiden (Ex 50), leading to the Maiden article and to Ms Wilkinson (and then to Mr Llewellyn and, by them, to people who labored on the Project programme (Project team)). 208 As I have already noted, this cover-up or victimisation allegation was perceived by the Project workforce as being crucial aspect of the Project programme and its deployment meant her account achieved much notoriety and public curiosity. 202 The notion Ms Higgins’ proof has been so discredited by submit-incident representations to Mr Dillaway or the AFP (or Ms Brown as mentioned under), such that the Court can’t safely rely on anything she has mentioned, not only puts the point much too highly however is simplistic.
I mean, the witness has given proof about what the settlement was and what it concerned, together with an admission of liability by the Commonwealth, and there might or may not be permissible questions based on it, however it’s a much decrease customary, being obvious relevance. Senior counsel for Network Ten, had additionally referred to his considerations as to the welfare of the witness and later made a submission concerning the cross-examination changing into “oppressive” (T899.14). The submission was developed by asserting that her evidence “has been so discredited, and she has been proven to be so manipulative that the Court can not safely depend on something she has stated”. 188 Ms Higgins was described “as a essentially dishonest witness such that the Court could not act on anything she says with out impartial corroborative proof”. I perceive he’s in courtroom. 183 The other common level emphasised, though additionally made by the respondents, is that to the extent that so-called “peripheral details” of her reconstructed memory have been fallacious, they don’t mirror dishonesty although they might raise a problem as to reliability. Additionally, there is the lack of nuance and superficiality of dismissing a witness as at all times untruthful or unreliable just because aspects, even important features of their evidence, fall into that description.
614 As to the first, till he bought into the witness field on this civil case there was no want for Mr Lehrmann to recount what occurred. I call for production of the deed – was there a deed or was it only a settlement? She volunteers for a teen crisis hotline and violates the foundations when she takes an after-hours name from a date-rape sufferer, who remains to be in danger. Probing more deeply into the connection between homicide and homosexuality, Jim Warren, who worked as a counselor at the Washington State Corrections Center, did the intake interview for almost all of the youthful murderers (i.e., beneath age 36) in the state of Washington from 1971-82 (throughout the expansion of the gay rights movement). The criminalisation of sodomy in private between consenting males is a extreme limitation of a gay man’s right to equality in relation to sexual orientation, because it hits at one of the methods in which gays give expression to their sexual orientation. I was still upset, however knew she was in the end right about this.
And state courts construed any remaining proper of entry in ways in which furthered de jure and de facto racial segregation. Three December 2018 (Remote management of stolen automobiles) Is it a superb thing if the state can seize your automobile by remote control if stolen? 223 The issue as to the Commonwealth Deed arose initially from an exchange on 5 December 2023, at the top of a lengthy interval of Ms Higgins giving evidence. As with Mr Lehrmann, I am conscious that giving proof would have been a daunting and anxious expertise. It was additional mentioned that at any time when Ms Higgins was challenged in cross-examination, she felt she had a protected harbour in repeatedly giving “unresponsive and self-serving speeches” and exhibiting frustration on the process of being challenged (Network Ten itself described some of these incidents as “emotional outbursts”). I initially thought that in its written submissions, Network Ten was backsliding and flirting with a contention it can be procedurally unfair to make findings as to the falsity of representations made by Ms Higgins in the Commonwealth Deed, however I used to be disabused of my misapprehension in supplementary submissions and Network Ten additional acknowledged that any false representations made in the Commonwealth Deed might be relevant to the credit of Ms Higgins.